Act 67/68 of 2000, requires DEP to take local land use into
consideration, prior to issuing permits. The number of permits covered by the
policy, is very broad, however, a legal issue has arisen - DEP apparently does
not have the authority to make local land use conformance decisions.
It is becoming clear that many permits, including those for
air emissions, and for any types of wastewater permits, will take longer to
obtain in Pennsylvania. Permits for which Act 67/68 land use conformance must be
considered even includes permits for erosion and sedimentation basins at
construction sites. Initial experience indicates that, where local officials
have not been consulted, that permit delays of up to 30 days are being
experienced; and in limited instances applications are being returned until
local issues are dealt with. In one instance, at a scrap yard, a permit may be
denied, even though the facility operates per industry trade group standards.
Senior DEP officials are currently staying on top of the
issue, but, where the public becomes more involved in permitting processes,
extended permitting delays as occur in other states could occur in PA. In the
case of industrial facilities, where permits are needed to resolve compliance
issues, Consent Decrees may be needed to get around the permitting problem and
move needed projects forward. In such instances, there could develop a need for
expanded public participation, as, unlike other states, there is no routine
mechanism in PA for DEP public notice of Consent Decrees.
Although DEP issued guidance on how to handle Act 67/Act 68
of 2000 local land use conformance in late January, many observers believe that
it will only be a matter of time before the issue winds up in the courts. The
reason for this is that surrounding states, including both New Jersey and New
York, have for a long period of years had more elaborate procedures for projects
involving multiple permits, for determining the environmental impact of
permitting decisions, and for reaching consensus among permitting authorities,
when they are involved in issuing multiple permits of the site. Frequently,
public involvement is included in the permit process.
We at RT are concerned that the local land use conformance
issue, over time, will turn out to be much more complicated than currently
envisioned by DEP. For environmental progress to continue to be made in PA, and
for infrastructure to keep up with population growth, permits do need to be
issued in a timely manner. Holding up needed permits while growth continues
raises prices, makes PA less competitive and delays environmental progress. RT
will continue to watch this issue in the months and years ahead.
- Gary Brown